The police have a power to arrest an individual for up to 12 hours if they have reasonable grounds to suspect that the person has committed a crime punishable by imprisonment. The reasonable grounds for suspicion do not require to be corroborated and during the course of arrested the suspect, while having the right to have a solicitor informed of his arrested, has no automatic right to have that solicitor present during any questioning. If being questioned, the any arrested persons must be cautioned that they need not answer any questions. In the absence of such a caution evidence of any answers given in response to such questioning is likely to be inadmissible in a subsequent prosecution. The police have powers during the course of arrest to take samples, fingerprints etc. from the individual. At the end of the 6 hour period the individual must be released or charged.
For accident claims to succeed you need to show 2 main things – firstly that the accident was caused by fault or negligence on the part of the person against whom you wish to make the claim; and secondly, that as a result of that fault or negligence you suffered some form of loss, such as an injury, loss of income, damage to property, etc. However, the other person’s act of negligence must be of a type that would have been avoided if he or she had taken reasonable precautions. In addition the person responsible will only have to compensate you for losses which are reasonably foreseeable.
There are time limits for pursuing such cases, and indeed many other legal claims, which means it is better to take legal advice about any such claims as soon as you possibly can. After these time limits expire, you will generally not be able to pursue your claim, no matter how strong it may be; although there are some exceptions to this rule.
In appropriate cases we will be prepared to proceed with accident claims on a “no win – no fee” basis. Please ask us about this.
These can either be for aliment – based on the income and expenditure of both parties and continuing for up to 3 years after divorce – or for capital – usually based on the value of the “matrimonial property” at the separation date. That property nowadays sometimes includes pension rights which may have a very large value.
The law normally looks for a “clean break” on divorce, so that continuing aliment after divorce is relatively unusual nowadays, particularly if there has been an award of a capital sum of money. However, there can still be awards of aliment (termed “periodical allowance”) if either spouse can show that such an award will be necessary for a period to allow for adjustment to the changed financial circumstances.